ORA-12638 [Credential retrieval failed]
What's the case? Well, after you have set up Kerberos authentication, your database links seize working with ORA-12638: Credential retrieval failed, as soon as both databases are Kerberos aware.Now, of course this is a situation you do not want. You want administrators and users to log in using their working environment credentials, but you rely on named accounts, and passwords, for database links.
Alas. Here comes Bug 6341668: CLIENT CAN NOT CONNECT TO DATABASE BY PASSWORD IF ANY KERBEROS PROBLEM OCCURS. Current status: 82 "Closed, not a bug". Al least someone else tried Kerberos authentication...
This is in contradiction with another Kerberos-related bug, # 2647883: Kerberos current user database links do not work (See Doc ID 2647883.8), where the actual workaround is ... use fixed user database links (!).
Catch-22, eh?
I hate it when I get confronted with this rubbish on Friday afternoons. It ruins my weekend!
Oh - might anyone wonder: this is cross platform, 10.2.0.4.
One other reference on Oracle Support: TNS-12638 when database authentication tried on Kerberos setup (Doc ID 972896.1)
Updates
ASO is standard
There's a note stating the Advanced Security Option is now standard with the Enterprise Database Install. Makes you wonder: is it included in the standard license fee, then?Patch 10.2.0.5
Took the time to update the 10.2.0.4 environment I tested the scenario in to 10.2.0.5, which does have some Kerberos related bugs resolved. The result of all this is not only a ruined Sunday, it's also not resolving anything.C:\>sqlplus /@db10
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production on Sun Sep 26 18:32:25 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select sysdate from dual@fvb;
select sysdate from dual@fvb
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12638: Credential retrieval failed
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production on Sun Sep 26 18:32:25 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select sysdate from dual@fvb;
select sysdate from dual@fvb
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12638: Credential retrieval failed
Only after removing the services from sqlnet.ora on the server side, it works:
[ora10@db1 admin]$ cat sqlnet.ora
names.default_domain=home.local
# sqlnet.authentication_services=(beq, kerberos5)
sqlnet.kerberos5_conf=/oracle/db10/admin/krb5.conf
sqlnet.kerberos5_keytab=/oracle/db10/admin/db1.keytab
sqlnet.authentication_kerberos5_service=orcl
sqlnet.kerberos5_conf_mit=true
Which makes the same query on the client work... instantaneous!
SQL> select sysdate from dual@fvb;
SYSDATE
---------
26-SEP-10
It's getting weirder
I stumbled upon this, trying to find a workable solution on maintainting two TNS_ADMIN locations on the server. A similar problem has been logged as Bug 5054469: "DATABASE AUTHENTICATED USERS REQUIRE KERBEROS CREDENTIAL CACHE TO CONNECT", which has been closed as duplicate of (internal) bug 9056628.Explain: how can a bug# 5 million-and-something be closed as a duplicate of bug# almost-twice-as-high? Makes me wonder.
And the best is this: Doc ID 972896.1 (TNS-12638 when database authentication tried on Kerberos setup) states "This has been an issue in the past that the authentication services are not skipped to next when first fails".
Yeah right: has been... in the past...
2 comments:
still getting ORA-12638 in Oracle 21.6
Mostly users that create a SR1 requests and give up after months of non-progress.
nauztk5aauthent: Error building credentials request "9"
And MOS keeps closing bugs as not-a-bugs
Well, what can I say. It's been twelve (12!) years since I wrote this.
Marketing, I suppose. Use Oracle Directory Services (at a cost!!!) or fail. Have not been working with Oracle since 2018 or so. So, all comment are pure speculation on my side.
Post a Comment